SAS

**StudySAS Blog: Mastering Clinical Data Management with SAS** 2024-09-05 18:44:00

by  • 

Finding EPOCH Values in SDTM Datasets using a SAS Macro

Finding EPOCH Values in SDTM Datasets using a SAS Macro

Author: [Sarath]

Date: [05SEP2024]

The EPOCH variable is essential in many SDTM datasets as it helps describe the period during which an event, observation, or assessment occurs. In clinical trials, correctly capturing and analyzing the EPOCH variable across datasets is crucial. This post walks through a SAS macro program that automates the process of finding all EPOCH values from any dataset within an entire library of SDTM datasets.

Program Overview

This macro program loops through all the datasets in a specified library, checks for the presence of the EPOCH variable, and extracts the unique values of EPOCH from each dataset. It then consolidates the results and displays them for review.

Key Features:

  • Automatically identifies SDTM datasets containing the EPOCH variable.
  • Extracts unique values from the EPOCH variable for each dataset.
  • Combines results into a single dataset for ease of review.

Macro Code

Here’s the macro that performs the task:

%macro find_epoch(libname=);

    /* Get a list of all datasets in the library */
    proc sql noprint;
        select memname
        into :dslist separated by ' '
        from sashelp.vcolumn
        where libname = upcase("&libname")
          and name = 'EPOCH';
    quit;

    /* Check if any dataset contains the EPOCH variable */
    %if &sqlobs = 0 %then %do;
        %put No datasets in &libname contain the variable EPOCH.;
    %end;
    %else %do;
        %put The following datasets contain the EPOCH variable: &dslist;

        /* Loop through each dataset and extract unique EPOCH values */
        %let ds_count = %sysfunc(countw(&dslist));
        %do i = 1 %to &ds_count;
            %let dsname = %scan(&dslist, &i);
            
            /* Extract unique values of EPOCH */
            proc sql;
                create table epoch_&dsname as
                select distinct '&&dsname' as Dataset, EPOCH
                from &libname..&&dsname
                where EPOCH is not missing;
            quit;
        %end;

        /* Combine the results from all datasets */
        data all_epochs;
            set epoch_:;
        run;

        /* Display the results */
        proc print data=all_epochs;
        title "Unique EPOCH values across datasets in &libname";
        run;
    %end;

%mend find_epoch;

/* Run the macro by specifying your SDTM library name */
%find_epoch(libname=sdtm);

How the Macro Works

The macro works by querying the SASHELP.VCOLUMN metadata table to check for the presence of the EPOCH variable in any dataset. It loops through the datasets that contain the variable, extracts distinct values, and aggregates the results into a single dataset.

Steps:

  1. Identifies all datasets in the specified library.
  2. Checks each dataset for the EPOCH variable.
  3. For datasets containing EPOCH, it extracts unique values.
  4. Combines the unique values from all datasets into one result dataset.

Use Case

Imagine you have a large collection of SDTM datasets and need to quickly check which datasets contain the EPOCH variable and what unique values it holds. Running this macro allows you to do this across your entire library with minimal effort.

Example of Use:

%find_epoch(libname=sdtm);

In this example, the macro will search for the EPOCH variable in the SDTM datasets stored in the library named SDTM. It will then display the unique values of EPOCH found in those datasets.

Conclusion

This macro simplifies the task of analyzing the EPOCH variable across multiple datasets in a library, saving time and reducing manual effort. By leveraging the power of PROC SQL and macros, you can automate this otherwise tedious process.

Feel free to adapt and expand this macro to suit your specific needs! Happy coding!

Read more →

SAS

Comprehensive SAS Interview Scenarios and Solutions for Clinical Programming

by  • 

Comprehensive SAS Interview Scenarios and Solutions for Clinical Programming

Comprehensive SAS Interview Scenarios and Solutions for Clinical Programming

Scenario 1: Creating SDTM Domains

Question: You are given a raw dataset from a clinical trial. How would you approach creating an SDTM domain?

Answer: First, I would familiarize myself with the SDTM Implementation Guide to understand the specific structure and variables required for the domain. I would then map the raw data to the corresponding SDTM variables, ensuring to follow CDISC standards. This involves creating a specification document that outlines the mapping rules and any necessary derivations. Finally, I would validate the domain using tools like Pinnacle 21 to ensure compliance.

Scenario 2: Handling Missing Data

Question: How do you handle missing data in your analysis datasets?

Answer: Handling missing data depends on the type of analysis. Common methods include imputation, where missing values are replaced with the mean, median, or mode of the dataset, or using a placeholder like “999” for numeric or “UNK” for character variables. The choice of method depends on the nature of the data and the analysis requirements. I would document the method used for handling missing data in the analysis dataset metadata.

Scenario 3: Pinnacle 21 Validation

Question: You’ve run Pinnacle 21 validation and received multiple warnings and errors. How do you address these?

Answer: I would prioritize the errors, as these typically indicate critical issues that could prevent submission. I would review the Pinnacle 21 documentation to understand the nature of each error and make the necessary corrections in the datasets. Warnings, while less critical, should also be addressed if they impact the integrity or clarity of the data. After making the corrections, I would rerun Pinnacle 21 to ensure all issues are resolved.

Scenario 4: Define.XML Creation

Question: How would you approach creating a Define.XML for a study with multiple domains?

Answer: Creating a Define.XML involves several steps:

  • Compile Metadata: Gather all necessary metadata, including variable definitions, controlled terminologies, value-level metadata, and derivations for each domain.
  • Use Define.XML Tools: Utilize software like SAS or Pinnacle 21 to create the XML file. These tools often come with templates that help structure the Define.XML according to CDISC standards.
  • Review and Validate: Ensure the XML is compliant with CDISC standards by using validation tools like Pinnacle 21 or WebSDM. Review the file to confirm that all metadata accurately reflects the study data.
  • Link Annotations: If applicable, link the Define.XML to the annotated CRF (aCRF) to ensure traceability from raw data to SDTM datasets.

Scenario 5: Mapping Specifications

Question: What steps do you take to create a mapping specification document for SDTM conversion?

Answer:

  1. Understand the Study: Review the protocol and CRFs to understand the study design and data collection process.
  2. Review Raw Data: Examine the raw datasets to identify the source variables and their formats.
  3. Create Mapping Specifications: Define how each variable in the raw dataset maps to the corresponding SDTM domain, including any derivations, transformations, or standardizations required.
  4. Document Assumptions: Clearly document any assumptions made during the mapping process, especially if data needs to be derived or inferred.
  5. Review and Validate: Have the mapping specification reviewed by a peer or a senior programmer to ensure accuracy and completeness.

Scenario 6: Custom Domain Creation

Question: If a study requires a custom domain not defined in the SDTM Implementation Guide, how would you create it?

Answer:

  1. Assess the Need: Determine why a custom domain is necessary and whether existing domains can be adapted instead.
  2. Define the Domain: Create a structure for the custom domain, ensuring it adheres to the SDTM model’s general principles, such as consistency in variable naming conventions and dataset structure.
  3. Document the Domain: Develop comprehensive documentation for the custom domain, including its purpose, structure, variables, and any derivations.
  4. Validate: Test the custom domain thoroughly to ensure it integrates well with the standard SDTM domains and meets submission requirements.

Scenario 7: Handling Large Datasets

Question: How would you optimize a SAS program to handle very large datasets?

Answer:

  • Efficient Data Step Processing: Use WHERE clauses to filter data early in the process and avoid unnecessary data processing.
  • Indexing: Apply indexing to frequently accessed variables to speed up data retrieval.
  • Memory Management: Utilize appropriate system options like MEMSIZE and SORTSIZE to optimize memory usage during processing.
  • SQL Optimization: For PROC SQL, avoid Cartesian joins and use appropriate joins (INNER, LEFT) to minimize processing time.
  • Parallel Processing: If possible, leverage SAS’s multi-threading capabilities or break the task into smaller chunks that can be processed in parallel.

Scenario 8: aCRF Annotation

Question: What is your process for annotating aCRFs?

Answer:

  1. Understand the CRF: Review the CRF to understand what data is being collected and how it relates to the SDTM domains.
  2. Annotate with SDTM Variables: Map each field on the CRF to its corresponding SDTM variable, noting the domain and variable name on the CRF.
  3. Ensure Clarity: Annotations should be clear and consistent, using standard CDISC nomenclature.
  4. Review and Validation: Have the annotated CRF reviewed by another programmer or a domain expert to ensure accuracy and completeness.

Scenario 9: Handling Adverse Events Data

Question: You are tasked with creating an Adverse Events (AE) domain. What steps would you follow?

Answer:

  1. Source Data Review: Examine the raw adverse event data to understand the structure and content.
  2. Mapping: Map the raw data to the AE domain variables, ensuring that all required and expected variables are included, such as AE term, start/end dates, severity, and relationship to treatment.
  3. Derivations: Derive any additional variables as required, such as AE duration or seriousness.
  4. Validation: Validate the AE dataset using Pinnacle 21 to ensure it meets SDTM standards and is ready for submission.

Scenario 10: Data Cleaning

Question: Describe how you would clean a dataset that has inconsistent date formats and missing values.

Answer:

  1. Identify Inconsistencies: Use PROC FREQ or PROC SQL to identify the inconsistent date formats.
  2. Standardize Dates: Convert all date variables to a standard format (e.g., ISO 8601) using functions like INPUT, PUT, or DATEPART.
  3. Handle Missing Values: Decide on an appropriate method for handling missing values based on the type of data (e.g., imputation, substitution with median values, or exclusion of incomplete records).
  4. Validation: After cleaning, review the dataset to ensure that all inconsistencies have been resolved and that the dataset is complete and ready for analysis.

Scenario 11: Generating Define.XML

Question: How do you ensure that the Define.XML you generate is fully compliant with CDISC standards?

Answer: I would follow these steps:

  • Utilize a CDISC-compliant tool like Pinnacle 21 to generate the Define.XML.
  • Ensure that all metadata, including variable attributes, controlled terminology, and value-level metadata, are accurately captured and documented in the Define.XML.
  • Link the Define.XML to the Annotated CRF (aCRF) and other supporting documentation for traceability.
  • Run validation checks using Pinnacle 21 to ensure that the Define.XML meets all CDISC requirements.
  • Review the Define.XML manually to confirm that it aligns with the study’s metadata and regulatory requirements.

Scenario 12: SDTM Mapping Validation

Question: What steps would you take to validate SDTM mapping for a clinical trial dataset?

Answer:

  • Cross-Check with Specifications: Ensure the SDTM mappings align with the mapping specifications and the SDTM Implementation Guide.
  • Use Pinnacle 21: Run Pinnacle 21 validation checks to identify any discrepancies, errors, or warnings in the mapped SDTM datasets.
  • Manual Review: Conduct a manual review of key variables and domains to ensure that the mappings are accurate and meaningful.
  • Peer Review: Have the mappings reviewed by a peer or senior programmer to catch any potential issues that might have been missed.
  • Final Validation: Re-run Pinnacle 21 and any other validation tools to ensure all issues are resolved and the datasets are compliant.

Scenario 13: Handling Ad-Hoc Requests

Question: You receive an ad-hoc request to provide summary statistics for a particular dataset that hasn’t been prepared yet. How do you handle this request?

Answer: I would:

  1. Clarify the Request: Ensure that I fully understand the specifics of what is being asked, including the variables of interest, the type of summary statistics required, and the timeframe.
  2. Prepare the Dataset: Quickly prepare the dataset by selecting the relevant variables and applying any necessary transformations or filters.
  3. Generate Statistics: Use PROC MEANS, PROC FREQ, or PROC SUMMARY to generate the requested summary statistics.
  4. Validate the Output: Review the output to ensure it accurately reflects the data and the request.
  5. Deliver the Results: Provide the results in the requested format, ensuring that they are clearly presented and annotated as necessary.

Scenario 14: Complex Data Merging

Question: How would you merge multiple datasets with different structures in SAS to create a comprehensive analysis dataset?

Answer:

  1. Identify Common Keys: Determine the common keys across datasets that will be used for merging (e.g., subject ID, visit number).
  2. Standardize Variables: Ensure that variables to be merged are standardized in terms of data type, length, and format.
  3. Merge Datasets: Use MERGE or PROC SQL to combine the datasets, ensuring that the merge keys are properly aligned.
  4. Handle Discrepancies: Address any discrepancies or missing data resulting from the merge, such as mismatched records or differing formats.
  5. Validate the Merged Dataset: Run checks to ensure that the merged dataset is accurate, complete, and ready for analysis.

Scenario 15: Handling Data Integrity Issues

Question: You discover data integrity issues during your analysis, such as duplicate records or outliers. How do you address these?

Answer:

  1. Identify and Isolate the Issues: Use PROC FREQ, PROC SORT with NODUPKEY, or other SAS procedures to identify duplicate records or outliers.
  2. Consult with Data Management: If necessary, consult with the data management team to understand the source of the issues and confirm whether they need to be corrected or excluded.
  3. Correct or Exclude Data: Depending on the issue, either correct the data (e.g., by removing duplicates) or flag the problematic records for exclusion from the analysis.
  4. Document the Process: Document the steps taken to address the data integrity issues, including any decisions made regarding data exclusion or correction.
  5. Proceed with Analysis: After addressing the issues, proceed with the analysis, ensuring that the data used is accurate and reliable.

Scenario 16: Creating Safety Reports

Question: How would you generate a safety report for a clinical trial using SAS?

Answer:

  1. Prepare the Data: Start by creating datasets for adverse events (AE), laboratory results (LB), and vital signs (VS), ensuring they are cleaned and standardized.
  2. Generate Descriptive Statistics: Use PROC FREQ and PROC MEANS to generate descriptive statistics for safety variables, such as incidence rates of adverse events, mean changes in lab values, and vital sign deviations.
  3. Summarize Adverse Events: Create summary tables that display the frequency and percentage of subjects experiencing each adverse event, stratified by treatment group.
  4. Create Listings: Generate detailed listings for serious adverse events, deaths, and other safety-related data points that require close review.
  5. Validate the Report: Ensure that all outputs are accurate by cross-verifying with the raw data and using validation checks, such as comparing with prior reports or known benchmarks.
  6. Format for Submission: Use PROC REPORT or ODS to format the output into tables and listings that meet regulatory submission standards.

Scenario 17: CDISC Compliance in SAS Programming

Question: How do you ensure your SAS programming complies with CDISC standards?

Answer:

  1. Follow CDISC Guidelines: Ensure that all datasets and variables conform to the SDTM or ADaM Implementation Guide, including naming conventions, variable formats, and domain structures.
  2. Use Pinnacle 21: Regularly run Pinnacle 21 validation checks to identify and correct any deviations from CDISC standards.
  3. Document All Processes: Maintain comprehensive documentation that explains the data mapping, derivation, and transformation processes, ensuring traceability and compliance with CDISC standards.
  4. Peer Review: Conduct peer reviews of your SAS code and datasets to ensure they adhere to CDISC guidelines and best practices.
  5. Stay Updated: Keep up with the latest CDISC updates and guidelines to ensure ongoing compliance and incorporate any new standards into your programming practices.

Scenario 18: Managing CDISC SDTM Mappings

Question: Describe how you manage SDTM mappings for multiple studies with varying data structures.

Answer:

  1. Standardize Processes: Develop and use standard operating procedures (SOPs) for SDTM mapping to ensure consistency across studies.
  2. Create Templates: Use mapping templates that can be adapted to different studies, minimizing the need to start from scratch each time.
  3. Version Control: Implement version control to manage changes in mapping specifications across different studies and ensure that the correct version is used for each submission.
  4. Automate Where Possible: Automate repetitive tasks in the mapping process using SAS macros or other tools to increase efficiency and reduce errors.
  5. Regular Review: Regularly review and update mapping specifications to incorporate new learnings, best practices, and regulatory requirements.

Scenario 19: Reporting Serious Adverse Events

Question: How would you create a report summarizing serious adverse events (SAEs) for a clinical trial?

Answer:

  1. Identify SAEs: Extract and review the data related to serious adverse events from the AE domain.
  2. Summarize by Treatment Group: Use PROC FREQ to summarize the incidence of SAEs by treatment group, including the number and percentage of subjects affected.
  3. Detail Listings: Generate detailed listings of each SAE, including subject ID, event term, start and end dates, severity, and outcome.
  4. Graphical Representation: Consider using PROC SGPLOT or PROC GCHART to create visual representations of SAE distributions across treatment groups.
  5. Validate: Cross-check the summary and listings against the raw data and previous reports to ensure accuracy.
  6. Prepare for Submission: Format the summary tables and listings according to regulatory guidelines, ensuring they are ready for inclusion in the Clinical Study Report (CSR).

Scenario 20: Resolving Data Discrepancies

Question: You discover discrepancies between the raw data and the SDTM datasets. How do you address this?

Answer:

  1. Identify the Discrepancies: Use PROC COMPARE to identify and isolate discrepancies between the raw data and the SDTM datasets.
  2. Determine the Source: Investigate the source of each discrepancy, whether it’s due to data entry errors, mapping issues, or other factors.
  3. Consult Stakeholders: Work with data management, statisticians, or other relevant stakeholders to resolve the discrepancies.
  4. Update the SDTM Datasets: Make necessary corrections to the SDTM datasets, ensuring that they accurately reflect the raw data.
  5. Document Changes: Keep detailed records of the discrepancies identified, the steps taken to resolve them, and the final changes made to the datasets.
  6. Revalidate: Re-run validation checks to ensure all discrepancies have been resolved and the datasets are now accurate and compliant.

Read more →

SAS

Comprehensive SAS Clinical Programming Interview Guide: Key Questions and Answers on SDTM, CDISC, and Data Submission Standards

by  • 

SAS Interview Questions and Answers

SAS Interview Questions and Answers

1) What do you understand about SDTM and its importance?

Answer: SDTM (Standard Data Tabulation Model) is a standard structure for study data tabulations that are submitted as part of a product application to a regulatory authority such as the FDA. SDTM plays a crucial role in ensuring that data is consistently structured, making it easier to review and analyze clinical trial data.

2) What are the key components of a Mapping Document in SAS programming?

Answer: A Mapping Document in SAS programming typically includes:

  • Source Data Variables: The original variables in the source datasets.
  • Target SDTM Variables: The SDTM-compliant variables to which the source data is mapped.
  • Transformation Rules: The rules and logic applied to transform the source data to SDTM format.
  • Derivations: Any additional calculations or derivations needed to create SDTM variables.

3) How do you use Pinnacle 21 for SDTM compliance?

Answer: Pinnacle 21 is a software tool used to validate datasets against CDISC standards, including SDTM. It checks for compliance with CDISC rules, identifies errors, and generates reports to help programmers correct any issues before submission to regulatory authorities.

4) What is an annotated CRF (aCRF) and how is it used?

Answer: An annotated CRF (aCRF) is a version of the Case Report Form (CRF) that includes annotations mapping each field to the corresponding SDTM variables. It serves as a reference for how the collected data should be represented in the SDTM datasets.

5) Can you explain CDISC and its importance in clinical trials?

Answer: CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium) is an organization that develops standards to streamline the clinical research process. CDISC standards, such as SDTM and ADaM, ensure that data is consistently structured, improving the efficiency of data sharing, analysis, and regulatory review.

6) What is Define.XML and why is it important?

Answer: Define.XML is a machine-readable metadata file that describes the structure and content of clinical trial datasets, such as SDTM and ADaM. It is an essential component of regulatory submissions, providing transparency and traceability of the data.

7) What is a cSDRG and how does it relate to Define.XML?

Answer: The cSDRG (Clinical Study Data Reviewer’s Guide) is a document that accompanies Define.XML and provides context to the submitted datasets. It explains the study design, data collection, and any decisions made during the mapping process, helping reviewers understand the data and its lineage.

8) How do you validate SDTM datasets using Pinnacle 21?

Answer: To validate SDTM datasets using Pinnacle 21, you load the datasets into the software and run a compliance check. Pinnacle 21 then generates a report highlighting any issues, such as missing variables, incorrect formats, or non-compliance with CDISC standards. You would then address these issues and rerun the validation until the datasets pass all checks.

9) What are the main differences between SDTM and ADaM datasets?

Answer: SDTM datasets are designed to represent the raw data collected during a clinical trial, organized in a standard format. ADaM datasets, on the other hand, are derived from SDTM datasets and are used for statistical analysis. ADaM datasets include additional variables and structure to support the specific analyses described in the study’s statistical analysis plan (SAP).

10) What challenges might you face when mapping data to SDTM standards?

Answer: Common challenges when mapping data to SDTM standards include:

  • Inconsistent or missing data in the source datasets.
  • Complex derivations required to meet SDTM requirements.
  • Ensuring compliance with CDISC rules while maintaining data integrity.
  • Managing updates to the SDTM Implementation Guide and corresponding changes to the mapping logic.

11) How do you ensure the accuracy of Define.XML in your submission?

Answer: Ensuring the accuracy of Define.XML involves meticulous mapping of each dataset variable, validation using tools like Pinnacle 21, and thorough review of the metadata descriptions. It is essential to cross-check Define.XML against the SDTM datasets, annotated CRF, and mapping specifications to ensure consistency.

12) What is the significance of controlled terminology in CDISC standards?

Answer: Controlled terminology in CDISC standards refers to the standardized set of terms and codes used across datasets to ensure consistency and interoperability. It is crucial for maintaining data quality and facilitating accurate data analysis and reporting, especially in regulatory submissions.

13) What are some common errors identified by Pinnacle 21 in SDTM datasets?

Answer: Common errors identified by Pinnacle 21 in SDTM datasets include:

  • Missing required variables or domains.
  • Incorrect variable formats or lengths.
  • Non-compliance with controlled terminology.
  • Inconsistent or invalid data values.

14) How do you handle discrepancies between the aCRF and SDTM datasets?

Answer: Discrepancies between the aCRF and SDTM datasets are handled by reviewing the mapping logic and ensuring that the SDTM datasets accurately reflect the data collected in the CRF. If necessary, updates to the mapping document or annotations on the aCRF are made to resolve inconsistencies.

15) What is the process for creating a cSDRG?

Answer: The process for creating a cSDRG involves documenting the study design, data collection processes, and any decisions made during data mapping. This includes explaining any deviations from standard CDISC practices, justifications for custom domains, and providing details on data derivations. The cSDRG is typically created alongside Define.XML and reviewed as part of the submission package.

16) What are the key elements of a successful CDISC implementation in a clinical trial?

Answer: Key elements of a successful CDISC implementation include:

  • Thorough understanding of CDISC standards (SDTM, ADaM, Define.XML).
  • Accurate and consistent mapping of source data to SDTM.
  • Effective use of tools like Pinnacle 21 for validation and compliance checks.
  • Comprehensive documentation, including aCRF, Define.XML, and cSDRG.
  • Collaboration between data management, programming, and regulatory teams.

17) How do you ensure data traceability from source to submission in SDTM datasets?

Answer: Ensuring data traceability from source to submission in SDTM datasets involves:

  • Maintaining a clear and detailed mapping document that links source data variables to SDTM variables.
  • Using annotated CRFs to trace the origin of each SDTM variable.
  • Documenting all transformations and derivations in the mapping specifications and Define.XML.
  • Validating datasets at each stage using Pinnacle 21 or similar tools to ensure consistency and compliance.

18) What is the role of the Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) in regulatory submissions?

Answer: The Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) plays a critical role in regulatory submissions by providing a standardized format for organizing and presenting clinical trial data. This standardization facilitates the efficient review and analysis of data by regulatory authorities, such as the FDA, and ensures consistency across submissions.

19) How do you manage updates to SDTM and ADaM standards in ongoing studies?

Answer: Managing updates to SDTM and ADaM standards in ongoing studies involves:

  • Regularly reviewing updates to CDISC Implementation Guides and controlled terminology.
  • Assessing the impact of changes on existing datasets and mapping documents.
  • Implementing necessary updates to datasets, mapping documents, and Define.XML.
  • Revalidating datasets using tools like Pinnacle 21 to ensure continued compliance.

20) What are some best practices for creating Define.XML files?

Answer: Best practices for creating Define.XML files include:

  • Ensuring all metadata is accurately represented, including variable attributes, derivations, and controlled terminology.
  • Maintaining consistency between Define.XML and the SDTM datasets, aCRF, and mapping documents.
  • Validating Define.XML using Pinnacle 21 or other tools to identify and correct any errors.
  • Providing clear and concise descriptions for each dataset and variable to aid in regulatory review.

21) How do you approach the validation of aCRF and Define.XML?

Answer: Validation of aCRF and Define.XML involves cross-referencing the annotations and metadata with the SDTM datasets to ensure accuracy. Tools like Pinnacle 21 are used to check for compliance with CDISC standards, and any discrepancies are addressed through revisions to the documents.

22) Can you describe the process of creating a custom domain in SDTM?

Answer: Creating a custom domain in SDTM involves:

  • Identifying the need for a custom domain based on study-specific data not covered by existing SDTM domains.
  • Defining the structure and variables for the custom domain, ensuring alignment with SDTM principles.
  • Documenting the custom domain in the Define.XML and providing explanations in the cSDRG.
  • Validating the custom domain using Pinnacle 21 to ensure compliance with CDISC standards.

23) What is the importance of maintaining consistency between aCRF, SDTM datasets, and Define.XML?

Answer: Maintaining consistency between aCRF, SDTM datasets, and Define.XML is crucial for ensuring that the data submission is clear, accurate, and compliant with regulatory requirements. Consistency helps avoid discrepancies that could lead to questions from regulatory reviewers, delays in the review process, or even rejections of the submission.

24) How do you ensure that your SDTM mapping document is comprehensive and accurate?

Answer: To ensure that the SDTM mapping document is comprehensive and accurate, you should:

  • Thoroughly review the CRF and source data to identify all relevant variables.
  • Apply CDISC guidelines strictly to map variables to appropriate SDTM domains and variables.
  • Document all derivations, transformations, and any assumptions made during mapping.
  • Conduct peer reviews and validate the mappings using tools like Pinnacle 21.

25) How do you handle discrepancies found during the validation of SDTM datasets?

Answer: When discrepancies are found during the validation of SDTM datasets, the following steps are taken:

  • Identify the source of the discrepancy by reviewing the mapping document, aCRF, and source data.
  • Correct the discrepancy in the SDTM dataset or mapping logic.
  • Revalidate the dataset using Pinnacle 21 or other validation tools to ensure the issue has been resolved.
  • Document the discrepancy and resolution process for transparency and future reference.

26) What are the common challenges when creating SDTM datasets?

Answer: Common challenges when creating SDTM datasets include:

  • Handling incomplete or inconsistent source data.
  • Ensuring compliance with evolving CDISC guidelines and standards.
  • Mapping complex data transformations accurately to SDTM format.
  • Maintaining consistency across different studies or data sources.

27) How do you document the SDTM mapping process?

Answer: Documenting the SDTM mapping process involves:

  • Creating a detailed mapping specification document that outlines how each source variable is transformed into the corresponding SDTM variable.
  • Including derivation logic, data transformations, and any assumptions made during the process.
  • Ensuring the mapping document is aligned with the Define.XML and aCRF.
  • Reviewing and updating the document as needed throughout the study.

28) What is the significance of a controlled terminology in SDTM datasets?

Answer: Controlled terminology ensures that data is consistently coded across datasets, which is essential for accurate data analysis and regulatory review. It helps maintain consistency and facilitates data integration across studies and submissions.

29) How do you approach the creation of the cSDRG?

Answer: Creating the cSDRG involves:

  • Summarizing the study design and key data collection processes.
  • Explaining any deviations from standard CDISC practices and justifying any custom domains or variables.
  • Documenting key decisions made during the SDTM mapping and dataset creation process.
  • Ensuring the cSDRG provides clear context and guidance for regulatory reviewers.

30) How do you ensure the accuracy and completeness of your Define.XML?

Answer: Ensuring the accuracy and completeness of Define.XML involves:

  • Cross-referencing the Define.XML against the SDTM datasets, aCRF, and mapping documents to ensure alignment.
  • Using validation tools like Pinnacle 21 to identify any errors or inconsistencies.
  • Reviewing and updating the Define.XML to reflect any changes in the study data or metadata.
  • Providing clear and detailed descriptions for each variable, dataset, and code list to support regulatory review.

31) What is the role of the aCRF in the context of SDTM and Define.XML?

Answer: The aCRF (annotated CRF) plays a crucial role in the context of SDTM and Define.XML by providing a visual representation of how the collected data is mapped to the SDTM domains. It serves as a reference for both the SDTM mapping and the Define.XML, ensuring consistency and traceability throughout the submission process.

32) How do you manage the integration of external data sources into SDTM datasets?

Answer: Managing the integration of external data sources into SDTM datasets involves:

  • Carefully mapping external data to the appropriate SDTM domains and variables.
  • Ensuring consistency with existing SDTM datasets in terms of structure, format, and controlled terminology.
  • Documenting the integration process, including any transformations or derivations applied to the external data.
  • Validating the integrated datasets to ensure compliance with CDISC standards.

33) What are some common pitfalls to avoid when creating Define.XML files?

Answer: Common pitfalls to avoid when creating Define.XML files include:

  • Inaccurate or incomplete metadata descriptions.
  • Inconsistent variable names, labels, or formats between Define.XML and SDTM datasets.
  • Missing or incorrect controlled terminology assignments.
  • Failure to validate the Define.XML using tools like Pinnacle 21 before submission.

34) How do you handle updates to the SDTM Implementation Guide during an ongoing study?

Answer: Handling updates to the SDTM Implementation Guide during an ongoing study involves:

  • Monitoring updates to the SDTM Implementation Guide and assessing their impact on current datasets.
  • Revising the SDTM mapping document and datasets to align with the updated guide.
  • Updating the Define.XML and aCRF to reflect any changes in the mapping or dataset structure.
  • Revalidating datasets and metadata using Pinnacle 21 to ensure compliance with the new standards.

35) What is the significance of the RELREC and SUPPQUAL domains in SDTM?

Answer: The RELREC (Related Records) domain is used to link related records across different SDTM domains, while the SUPPQUAL (Supplemental Qualifiers) domain is used to capture additional information not included in the standard SDTM variables. Both domains play a crucial role in ensuring that all relevant data is captured and can be analyzed together, even if it doesn’t fit neatly into the predefined SDTM structure.

36) How do you ensure consistency between the SDTM datasets and ADaM datasets?

Answer: Ensuring consistency between SDTM and ADaM datasets involves:

  • Using SDTM datasets as the source for ADaM datasets to maintain traceability and data integrity.
  • Applying consistent derivation logic and transformations across both dataset types.
  • Documenting the relationship between SDTM and ADaM datasets in the Define.XML and analysis metadata.
  • Validating both SDTM and ADaM datasets using Pinnacle 21 or similar tools to ensure compliance with CDISC standards.

37) How do you approach the validation of custom domains in SDTM?

Answer: Validating custom domains in SDTM involves:

  • Ensuring the custom domain structure aligns with SDTM principles and CDISC guidelines.
  • Documenting the custom domain in the Define.XML and explaining its purpose and structure in the cSDRG.
  • Using validation tools like Pinnacle 21 to check for compliance with CDISC standards, even if the domain is custom.
  • Conducting thorough peer reviews to ensure the custom domain is accurate and meets the study’s needs.

38) What is the role of metadata in the context of Define.XML and cSDRG?

Answer: Metadata plays a critical role in Define.XML and cSDRG by providing detailed information about the structure, content, and meaning of the datasets. In Define.XML, metadata describes each dataset, variable, and code list, while in the cSDRG, it helps explain the study design, data collection processes, and any deviations from standard practices. Metadata ensures that the data is well-documented, transparent, and traceable, facilitating regulatory review and analysis.

39) How do you ensure that your SDTM datasets are submission-ready?

Answer: Ensuring that SDTM datasets are submission-ready involves:

  • Validating the datasets using Pinnacle 21 to ensure compliance with CDISC standards.
  • Reviewing the Define.XML and cSDRG to ensure all metadata is accurate and complete.
  • Cross-referencing the SDTM datasets with the aCRF to ensure consistency and traceability.
  • Conducting thorough quality checks and peer reviews to identify and resolve any issues before submission.

40) What are the common challenges in implementing CDISC standards in clinical trials?

Answer: Common challenges in implementing CDISC standards in clinical trials include:

  • Adapting existing data collection and management processes to align with CDISC standards.
  • Ensuring that all team members are trained and knowledgeable about CDISC requirements.
  • Managing the complexity of mapping and transforming data to meet SDTM and ADaM standards.
  • Keeping up with updates to CDISC Implementation Guides and controlled terminology.

41) How do you approach the creation and validation of aCRF?

Answer: The creation and validation of aCRF involve:

  • Annotating the CRF to map each data collection field to the corresponding SDTM variables.
  • Ensuring that the annotations align with the SDTM mapping document and Define.XML.
  • Validating the aCRF by cross-referencing it with the SDTM datasets to ensure accuracy and consistency.
  • Reviewing the aCRF with the study team and regulatory specialists to ensure it meets submission requirements.

42) What is the significance of the SUPPQUAL domain in SDTM?

Answer: The SUPPQUAL (Supplemental Qualifiers) domain in SDTM is used to capture additional information that does not fit into the standard SDTM variables. It allows for flexibility in representing data that may be unique to a specific study or does not have a predefined place in the existing SDTM domains. SUPPQUAL ensures that all relevant data is included in the submission, even if it requires customization.

43) How do you manage updates to controlled terminology in an ongoing clinical trial?

Answer: Managing updates to controlled terminology in an ongoing clinical trial involves:

  • Monitoring updates to CDISC-controlled terminology and assessing their impact on the current study.
  • Updating the SDTM datasets and Define.XML to reflect the new terminology.
  • Revalidating datasets using Pinnacle 21 to ensure compliance with the updated terminology.
  • Communicating changes to the study team and ensuring that all relevant documentation is updated accordingly.

44) How do you approach the creation of a custom domain in SDTM?

Answer: Creating a custom domain in SDTM involves:

  • Identifying the need for a custom domain based on study-specific data not covered by existing SDTM domains.
  • Defining the structure and variables for the custom domain, ensuring alignment with SDTM principles.
  • Documenting the custom domain in the Define.XML and providing explanations in the cSDRG.
  • Validating the custom domain using Pinnacle 21 to ensure compliance with CDISC standards.

45) What is the importance of maintaining consistency between aCRF, SDTM datasets, and Define.XML?

Answer: Maintaining consistency between aCRF, SDTM datasets, and Define.XML is crucial for ensuring that the data submission is clear, accurate, and compliant with regulatory requirements. Consistency helps avoid discrepancies that could lead to questions from regulatory reviewers, delays in the review process, or even rejections of the submission.

46) How do you ensure that your SDTM mapping document is comprehensive and accurate?

Answer: To ensure that the SDTM mapping document is comprehensive and accurate, you should:

  • Thoroughly review the CRF and source data to identify all relevant variables.
  • Apply CDISC guidelines strictly to map variables to appropriate SDTM domains and variables.
  • Document all derivations, transformations, and any assumptions made during mapping.
  • Conduct peer reviews and validate the mappings using tools like Pinnacle 21.

47) How do you handle discrepancies found during the validation of SDTM datasets?

Answer: When discrepancies are found during the validation of SDTM datasets, the following steps are taken:

  • Identify the source of the discrepancy by reviewing the mapping document, aCRF, and source data.
  • Correct the discrepancy in the SDTM dataset or mapping logic.
  • Revalidate the dataset using Pinnacle 21 or other validation tools to ensure the issue has been resolved.
  • Document the discrepancy and resolution process for transparency and future reference.

48) What are the common challenges when creating SDTM datasets?

Answer: Common challenges when creating SDTM datasets include:

  • Handling incomplete or inconsistent source data.
  • Ensuring compliance with evolving CDISC guidelines and standards.
  • Mapping complex data transformations accurately to SDTM format.
  • Maintaining consistency across different studies or data sources.

49) How do you document the SDTM mapping process?

Answer: Documenting the SDTM mapping process involves:

  • Creating a detailed mapping specification document that outlines how each source variable is transformed into the corresponding SDTM variable.
  • Including derivation logic, data transformations, and any assumptions made during the process.
  • Ensuring the mapping document is aligned with the Define.XML and aCRF.
  • Reviewing and updating the document as needed throughout the study.

50) How do you approach the validation of custom domains in SDTM?

Answer: Validating custom domains in SDTM involves:

  • Ensuring the custom domain structure aligns with SDTM principles and CDISC guidelines.
  • Documenting the custom domain in the Define.XML and explaining its purpose and structure in the cSDRG.
  • Using validation tools like Pinnacle 21 to check for compliance with CDISC standards, even if the domain is custom.
  • Conducting thorough peer reviews to ensure the custom domain is accurate and meets the study’s needs.

Read more →

SAS

MACRO Debugging options.

by  • 

Macro Debugging Options in SAS

Macro Debugging Options in SAS

The SAS Macro Facility is a powerful feature that allows for dynamic code generation and automation. However, when macros become complex, it can be challenging to understand how they are executing and where issues might arise. SAS provides several debugging options to help developers trace the execution of macros and diagnose problems. In this article, we will explore the following debugging options:

  • MPRINT
  • MLOGIC
  • SYMBOLGEN
  • MACROGEN
  • MFILE

MPRINT

The MPRINT option is used to display the SAS statements that are generated by macro execution. This option helps you see the actual code that a macro produces, which is essential for understanding what your macro is doing.

Basic Example:

options mprint;

%macro greet(name);
    %put Hello, &name!;
%mend greet;

%greet(Sarath);

When you run the above code with the MPRINT option enabled, you will see the following output in the SAS log:

MPRINT(GREET):   %put Hello, Sarath!;

This output shows that the macro successfully resolved the &name variable to “Sarath” and executed the %put statement with that value.

Advanced Example:

Consider a more complex macro that generates a data step based on input parameters:

options mprint;

%macro filter_data(age_limit);
    data filtered;
        set sashelp.class;
        where age > &age_limit;
    run;
%mend filter_data;

%filter_data(12);

With MPRINT enabled, the log will show the following:

MPRINT(FILTER_DATA):   data filtered;
MPRINT(FILTER_DATA):   set sashelp.class;
MPRINT(FILTER_DATA):   where age > 12;
MPRINT(FILTER_DATA):   run;

This output is the exact code generated and executed by the macro, making it easier to verify that your macro is working as intended.

MLOGIC

The MLOGIC option provides detailed information about the macro execution logic, including the evaluation of conditions, the flow of macro execution, and the resolution of macro variable values. This option is particularly useful when debugging complex macros that involve conditional logic and multiple macro variables.

Basic Example:

options mlogic;

%macro check_age(age);
    %if &age > 12 %then %put Age is greater than 12;
    %else %put Age is 12 or less;
%mend check_age;

%check_age(14);

The log output with MLOGIC enabled will be:

MLOGIC(CHECK_AGE):  Beginning execution.
MLOGIC(CHECK_AGE):  %IF condition &age > 12 is TRUE
MLOGIC(CHECK_AGE):  %PUT Age is greater than 12
Age is greater than 12
MLOGIC(CHECK_AGE):  Ending execution.

This output shows the logical flow within the macro, including how the %IF condition was evaluated and which branch of the logic was executed.

Advanced Example:

Let’s consider a macro that processes a dataset differently based on a condition:

options mlogic;

%macro process_data(gender);
    %if &gender = M %then %do;
        data males;
            set sashelp.class;
            where sex = "M";
        run;
    %end;
    %else %do;
        data females;
            set sashelp.class;
            where sex = "F";
        run;
    %end;
%mend process_data;

%process_data(M);

With MLOGIC enabled, the log will detail how the macro made its decision:

MLOGIC(PROCESS_DATA):  Beginning execution.
MLOGIC(PROCESS_DATA):  %IF condition &gender = M is TRUE
MLOGIC(PROCESS_DATA):  %DO loop beginning.
MLOGIC(PROCESS_DATA):  %END loop.
MLOGIC(PROCESS_DATA):  Ending execution.

This output provides insight into the decision-making process within the macro, showing that the macro correctly identified the gender as “M” and executed the appropriate branch of code.

SYMBOLGEN

The SYMBOLGEN option is used to display the resolution of macro variables, showing their values before and after resolution. This option is crucial for understanding how macro variables are being substituted during macro execution.

Basic Example:

options symbolgen;

%let myvar = 20;

%macro show_var;
    %put The value of myvar is &myvar;
%mend show_var;

%show_var;

The log output with SYMBOLGEN enabled will show the resolution of the macro variable:

SYMBOLGEN:  Macro variable MYVAR resolves to 20
The value of myvar is 20

This output confirms that the macro variable &myvar was correctly resolved to “20” before being used in the %put statement.

Advanced Example:

Consider a macro that constructs a filename dynamically based on a date:

options symbolgen;

%let year = 2024;
%let month = 09;
%let day = 01;

%macro create_filename;
    %let filename = report_&year.&month.&day..txt;
    %put &filename;
%mend create_filename;

%create_filename;

The log output with SYMBOLGEN enabled will detail the resolution process:

SYMBOLGEN:  Macro variable YEAR resolves to 2024
SYMBOLGEN:  Macro variable MONTH resolves to 09
SYMBOLGEN:  Macro variable DAY resolves to 01
SYMBOLGEN:  Macro variable FILENAME resolves to report_20240901.txt
report_20240901.txt

This output shows how the macro variables were resolved and concatenated to form the final filename.

MACROGEN

The MACROGEN option displays the source code of macros during their compilation. This is useful when you need to verify the structure of your macros, especially when dealing with complex nested macros or dynamic macro generation.

Example:

options macrogen;

%macro example_macro;
    %put This is a simple macro;
%mend example_macro;

%example_macro;

With MACROGEN enabled, the log will show when the macro definition is complete:

MACROGEN(EXAMPLE_MACRO):  Macro definition is complete.
This is a simple macro

While this option is not as frequently used as the others, it can be helpful in ensuring that your macro definitions are compiled as expected, particularly in complex macro libraries.

MFILE

The MFILE option allows you to direct the output of the MPRINT option to an external file. This can be particularly useful when you want to save the generated code for documentation, further analysis, or debugging purposes.

Example:

In this example, we will save the generated code to a file named mprint_output.sas:

filename mprint_file 'C:\temp\mprint_output.sas';
options mfile mprint;

%macro example;
    data _null_;
        set sashelp.class;
        where age > 12;
        put 'Processing ' name= age=;
    run;
%mend example;

%example;

options nomfile;
filename mprint_file clear;

With this setup, the generated SAS code from the macro will be written to the specified file. You can then open this file in a text editor to review the code:

data _null_;
    set sashelp.class;
    where age > 12;
    put 'Processing ' name= age=;
run;

This option is extremely helpful when you need to review the generated code outside of the SAS environment or when the log becomes too cluttered.

Conclusion

Each of these macro debugging options provides valuable insights into the execution of SAS macros. By using MPRINT, MLOGIC, SYMBOLGEN, MACROGEN, and MFILE effectively, you can diagnose issues, understand the flow of your macros, and ensure that your code is executing as intended. Mastering these tools is an essential skill for any SAS programmer working with macros.

Read more →