Tag: Statistics

Type I error rates in test of normality by simulation

This simulation tests the type I error rates of the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality in R and SAS.

First, we run a simulation in R. Notice the simulation is vectorized: there are no “for” loops that clutter the code and slow the simulation.


# type I error
alpha <- 0.05

# number of simulations
n.simulations <- 10000

# number of observations in each simulation
n.obs <- 100

# a vector of test results
type.one.error shapiro.test(rnorm(n.obs))$p.value)<alpha

# type I error for the whole simulation
mean(type.one.error)

# Store cumulative results in data frame for plotting
sim <- data.frame(
n.simulations = 1:n.simulations,
type.one.error.rate = cumsum(type.one.error) /
seq_along(type.one.error))

# plot type I error as function of the number of simulations
plot(sim, xlab="number of simulations",
ylab="cumulative type I error rate")

# a line for the true error rate
abline(h=alpha, col="red")

# alternative plot using ggplot2
require(ggplot2)
ggplot(sim, aes(x=n.simulations, y=type.one.error.rate)) +
geom_line() +
xlab('number of simulations') +
ylab('cumulative type I error rate') +
ggtitle('Simulation of type I error in Shapiro-Wilk test') +
geom_abline(intercept = 0.05, slope=0, col='red') +
theme_bw()

As the number of simulations increases, the type I error rate approaches alpha. Try it in R with any value of alpha and any number of observations per simulation.

It’s elegant the whole simulation can be condensed to 60 characters:


mean(replicate(10000,shapiro.test(rnorm(100))$p.value)<0.05)

Likewise, we now do a similar simulation of the Shapiro-Wilk test in SAS. Notice there are no macro loops: the simulation is simpler and faster using a BY statement.


data normal;
length simulation 4 i 3; /* save space and time */
do simulation = 1 to 10000;
do i = 1 to 100;
x = rand('normal');
output;
end;
end;
run;

proc univariate data=normal noprint ;
by simulation;
var x;
output out=univariate n=n mean=mean std=std NormalTest=NormalTest probn=probn;
run;

data univariate;
set univariate;
type_one_error = probnrun;

/* Summarize the type I error rates for this simulation */
proc freq data=univariate;
table type_one_error/nocum;
run;

In my SAS simulation the type I error rate was 5.21%.

Tested with R 3.0.2 and SAS 9.3 on Windows 7.

For more posts like this, see Heuristic Andrew.

Job Trends in the Analytics Market: New, Improved, now Fortified with C, Java, MATLAB, Python, Julia and Many More!

I’m expanding the coverage of my article, The Popularity of Data Analysis Software. This is the first installment, which includes a new opening and a greatly expanded analysis of the analytics job market. Here it is, from the abstract onward … Continue reading

Some popular regression procedures in SAS/STAT

With the new release of PROC ADAPTIVEREG in SAS 9.4, the tool belt of regressions in SAS/STAT is almost completed. Hope in the future there will be a designated procedure for k-NN in SAS/STAT.. 

What R Has Been Missing

While R has more methods than any other analytics software, it has been missing a crucial feature found in most other packages. SPSS Modeler had it first, way back when they still called it Clementine. Then SAS Institute realized how crucial … Continue reading

Community Contributors to SAS/STAT

I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. – Abraham Maslow, The Psychology of Science, 1966 Yes it’s true: since I have a pretty rich collection of SAS list processing macros, I’d like my list container to hold everything itemized. […]